INTERVIEW
WITH
Dovlet Ovezov Resident of Belgium and VIP member
Email contact : dovlet.ovezov@exec.org
Interview in Russian Listen to sample sound "bites" from
the interview:
Question 1 : Tell me about
yourself
If I were a Medieval baron to choose a motto for my
coat of arms, I would put "There is no way but up!"
This is the idea that helped me to progress within ten
years after graduation from the Law Faculty from a
junior government officer in the heart of Central Asia
to an international expert in the heart of Europe. I
was the first in many generations of my traditional
family to become a lawyer. At the age of 25 I was
already a Deputy Chief of the International Law
Department of the Ministry of Foreign Economic Affairs
of my country. I had a privilege to be among those who
helped to establish and develop the UN office in
Turkmenistan. I was the first lawyer from Turkmenistan
to be selected for a British Government sponsored
training program. I was a legal counsel for a large
oil and gas company and a well-known American strategy
and technology consulting. I am married for 12 happy
years and my son is already 10 years old. If I were to
describe myself in few words, I would say "ambitious",
"energetic", "creative".
Question 2 : What can you offer to your next employer ?
I can offer a whole set of transferable skills
covering communication, research and planning, human
relations, organization and management. I can
communicate effectively, listen attentively, gather
and analyse information, and, if necessary, organise
and inspire others. Moreover, I am flexible and
possess strong work survival ability. From
professional point of view I can offer my knowledge of
CIS countries, their laws, business style and customs.
Since I speak fluent Russian I can easily and quickly
obtain any necessary information whether from written
or other sources. I am good at reporting, presenting
information and establishing new useful contacts. I am
a quick learner and always up to knowing something
new, whether it is a new language or a new technology.
As a result, I can communicate in at least four
languages, proficient in Microsoft Office products,
image and sound software.
Question 3 : What are your strengths ?
My strengths are efficiency, resourcefulness and
diplomacy. I prioritise, identifying what I can do
myself and where I would need help or assistance from
my colleagues. The bottom line is, I do not "do my
best", I do what is necessary to achieve the
objective. That is because I believe that "doing the
best" doesn't mean I do what I have to do. When asked
to deliver a concrete product, most of the time your
best doesn't count if you fail to deliver. On the way
to getting things done there are no clichés or
recipes, for each project has its own "identity". This
is where I try to apply creativeness, i.e. based on my
own experience as well as on the experience of
accomplishing similar tasks finding the most
appropriate solution. And last, but not the least, I
am a team person. I enjoy being amongst the people and
feeling myself a part of a team. I enjoy making new
contacts and manage to win others' favour. This
ability helped me throughout, especially when
communicating with counterparts and collaborates from
former USSR where personality greatly matters. I can
take advantage of that when acting as a liaison.
Question 4 : What are your accomplishments ?
There is a number of accomplishments which I can be
proud of, but I will bring examples of just two of
them. When I was working for the UNDP office in my
country and I was only 26, I received an assignment to
co-ordinate the preparation of the Human Development
Report. This was quite a challenging task mainly
because such a report has never been done before in my
country. There was a mountain full of various data,
which I simply could not understand since I came from
a different background. Moreover, many of the
contributors and other team members were twice as old
than me, which potentially could create a problem of
communicating instructions. All that against the
background of tough deadlines. Knowing all that, I had
to co-ordinate the whole chain from obtaining draft
articles from authors to final print. I had to learn
as I worked, which I did. It was truly a team work and
I had to use the wisdom of my supervisor and the
experience of my colleagues, apply all my
interpersonal skills and intellectual capacity to get
it done. Finally, the Report was published and
available on-line and in hard copies. I am proud that
my name is there. My greatest achievement at my last
job was the successful completion of a project on
legal transition in the energy sector of the former
Soviet Union and some Eastern European states. This
work was first and foremost based on the data
pertaining to national legislations and economies of
respective countries and required a solid command in
English and Russian as well as the knowledge and
understanding of legal concepts. I could demonstrate
the ability not only to translate but also to convey
the message contained in the legislations in order to
conduct sensible and comprehensive analysis.
Question 5 : What are your limitations ?
Perhaps, the Outer Space. Everything that is on Earth
can be within my scope of interests. And if I am
interested, I can do it. If not alone, then "with a
little help from my friends". They say, an average man
takes with him in the grave up to 70 per cent of his
unrealized potentials. It would be a pity to waste
such an opportunity.
Question 6 : How much are you worth ?
I am far from putting figures next to this question.
When I was 27 I was worth to become the first young
lawyer from Turkmenistan to participate in the
professional training program sponsored by the British
Government. Three years ago I was worth offering a
responsible position in a policy-making international
institution. I was worth bringing me all the way from
the capital of a Central Asian country to the capital
of Europe. I was worth paying me salary that allowed
my family to live in decent conditions and my son to
get access to decent education. I am worth as much as
I can offer. I am worth trying.
Question 7 : What are your ambitions for the future ?
As far as my professional ambitions are concerned, I
have my Program Minimum and the Program Maximum.
Roughly, the Program Minimum covers the next decade or
so and includes growing together with and within a
company to an executive or management level. Possibly,
it would be a new division expanding the company's
clientele for the establishment of which I would
greatly contribute. Moreover, I would like to obtain a
degree on the subject of my choice to compliment my
practical experience with theory. This will provide
the necessary security and stability to graduate to
Program Maximum, whereby I envisage to quit employment
and to run my own business.
Question 8 : How long would it take you start contributing
to the firm?
Bearing in mind practicalities related to the overseas
relocation and the time required for familiarizing
myself with the new business environment, I would be
in a position to be fully engaged within 4-6 weeks.
This, however, depends on whether my new role will
require a swifter and more aggressive mobilization.
Question 9: What is your management style? To judge about his or her management style, one has to
be long enough in a management position. I would think
of seeking a balance between being a friend remaining
a boss. That is, having preserved the environment of
ease to be strict about implementation. What is
absolutely unacceptable for me is the First World War
German feldwebel or Soviet Union comrade commander
style, whereby the idea is that the person in charge
is the one who is always right and the rest just
follow the order. I believe in the team work, where
everybody contributes to the success. My task as a
manager is to clearly identify the task and then to
co-ordinate the team effort in accomplishing it.
Knowledge of each team member's major strengths and
weaknesses is of paramount importance. I tried not to
micromanage, leaving certain freedom of maneuver for
my colleagues (not subordinates) with reasonable
control to ensure timely and quality performance. My
perception of a team is a family of associates than a
mechanism of nuts and bolts.
Question 10: Why do you think you have a good potential to
be a manager?
I am a quick learner and possess the ability of
communicating what I have learnt to others. I can
organize people without extra pressure. I analise
events and processes and draw conclusions from
mistakes to avoid similar mistakes in the future. I
try to develop my critical thinking to facilitate
grasping the essence of a process or of a problem to
make the right decision. I have already achieved a lot
and I am ambitious, energetic and creative enough to
further develop my skills and to accumulate a level of
experience making a good manager.
Question 11: What would you look for in hiring people?
The work experience being a primary criteria, would
depend on the role I am hiring a person for. Having
established that he or she fits close enough to the
job, I would look for his or her personal qualities.
During the interview I would try to identify his or
her determination in achieving the goal, willingness
to learn, openness to a differing opinion,
flexibility, resourcefulness and whether he or she is
a loner or a team player.
Question 12: As a manager, have you ever had to fire
someone? No, but I would do so if I realize that he or she
deliberately sabotages performance, unwilling to
change and his activity or inactivity adversely
affects others.
Question 13: What do you see as the most difficult task of
being a manager?
I think the most difficult task for a manager is to
find himself in the epicenter of an inner conflict
between the team members. Taking sides could be
equally harmful as apparent indifference. It is very
important to pin down the little evil worm of conflict
before it eats through the whole healthy apple. The
next uneasy steps are using the common sense to
localize the conflict and try to resolve it.
Question 14: Describe what you feel is the best work
environment?
I feel very comfortable in the environment where my
opinion counts and where I have the right to be wrong
at times. I need to feel at ease and encouraged to
share my ideas with others without being defensive. I
don't mind pressure but not happy about unnecessary
"go-go" rush when it could have been avoided. I could
demonstrate better results when I could step in my
manager's office for advice or with an idea at hand.
Question 15: Looking back how do you describe your past
employer?
The first and foremost, The Energy Charter Secretariat
was a truly international team. Such a mix allowed the
organization to be immediately aware of all
developments in the member-states. The system of
internal communication was organised in a way to keep
everybody abreast with changes in the energy world. It
was a team excellent professionals and predominantly
terrific personalities from whom I have learnt a lot.
However, I was not completely happy about the
management style and the way the organization placed
itself in the outside world. I expected more of
outward activities beyond the "members of the club" to
assert its position compared to sister organisations.
I would say that the marketing side was the weakest
point of the organization. As a result, we and our
works are not widely known even in the country where
the headquarters are located. For me personally it
meant some sort of isolation and lack of opportunity
to expand personal contacts and exchange with people
operating in the same field.
Question 16: What have you done to increase productivity,
performance, efficiency, etc..?
By virtue of the work, I was to establish and develop
a network of external contacts who would provide the
most adequate and prompt information at a given
situation. Working on particular projects, I created a
universal electronic database of legislation and other
relevant data, which could be easily accessible any
time to anyone in the team.
Question 17: Whether you are a "computer wizard", how do
you respond to the financial side of your responsibilities?
Since I am a lawyer, the scope of my responsibilities
generally less involve managing financial part of the
business. However, when I was a project co-ordinator,
I was in charge of planning and subsequent monitoring
the budget of my projects. Therefore, not claiming
being an expert in finances, I have some idea on "how
stuff works".
Question 18: How many people have you supervised in your recent job?
Question 19: What do you like more, working with figures or words?
Definitely, I feel more comfortable working with
words. That was why I chose legal profession at the
first place. The world of figures is less attractive
to me and I let it rest with finance and economics
wizards. Nevertheless, I believe that quantative
evaluation and analysis exercises, being a part of
complex projects, add to clarity and order.
Question 20: How do you think that your subordinates
receive you?
I am not into mind-reading and I wish I knew what
people think of me. I remain conscious about my
behavior and attach great importance to interaction.
From what I saw so far, I think I managed to gain
certain respect and go along quite easily with all
people. When I was in charge of a team of ten, I saw
that my subordinates (though I don't like this word
much), felt at ease to share their problems and ideas
with me. I often organized semi-formal meetings, where
we could discuss the progress and problems that
occurred at a certain stage of project implementation.
The criticism I received was always positive and
constructive. I never had a feeling that people had
been carrying in their minds something against me and
were just waiting for a moment to stab me in the back
to get rid of me. I always encouraged an open dialogue
and it seem to have worked. My project teams were the
most efficient and our projects received additional
financing and expanded to become the largest among
others in the organisation.
Question 21: What do you think of your previous boss?
He was a great strategist and diplomat and was
excellent negotiator and amazingly erudite. He would
always give everybody a chance to express ideas,
provoke intensive discussions and remained impartial
and logical. He never micromanaged and allowed his
team some space and independence within the deadline.
However, I think he sometimes overestimated the
ability of others to understand what he meant to say
and the essence of the task. I also think that for a
manager it is worthwhile to occasionally climb down
from the Mount Olympus to see how mere mortals are
doing..
Question 22: Describe a situation in
which your work was criticized?
Most of the criticisms that I ever received were to
improve my attention to details, primarily of
technical or subordination nature. I am always open to
criticism if it is constructive and positive and I
took them all aboard. It only helps to improve. In the
end of the day, any experience counts. Yet, there was
one instance which stands alone and I am still not
sure whether it was a constructive criticism or a
search for a scapegoat "just in case". I was included
in a team of six for preparation of a policy event. By
summer, when our office was on holidays and so were
the most of our counterparts, the majority of the
planned activities have already happened and it was
decided to resume them in autumn. There was nothing
serious apparently requiring immediate attention and
co-ordination, except some minor details. Had there
been an urgency, I assumed that my colleagues could
take care of it without serious problems. Based on
that assumption, I took my days of leave, yet
remaining accessible and available. When I returned to
the office, I realized that something happened in my
absence and that was blamed on me. It took me to go to
a very high level management to find out where and
what was my fault. They told me that it was a wrong
time to go on leave and that in my absence they had
experienced communication problems with our
counterparts due to language constraints. I was
utterly surprised to see such a bad redistribution of
responsibilities. There were other 5 members of the
team perfectly aware of everything, and there were at
least one trainee and one secretary speaking the
language to take a couple of calls. I was to blame in
unprofessional behavior. To me, the fact that a couple
of calls triggered so much ado and caused nervousness
going as high as the top management, was evident of
poor team management. The bottom line is, I do not
accept criticism aiming at laying someone's
irresponsibility on my head.
Question 23: If I spoke with your boss
what he would say about your greatest strength and weaknesses?My last boss would say that if there is a need to find
out about sand movements on the Moon during eclipse,
they would ask me. They know that I can find any
information anywhere. They know that they can trust me
to liaise with the Russian speaking world. They know
that I am good at preparing presentations, making them
illustrative, informative yet interesting. I presume
that they also know that I can be the last to speak up
around the table and perhaps find me somewhat
hesitant. However, if you speak to my previous
managers, they could be surprised to hear such a
portrayal. To the contrary, they would say that I was
the one who spoke up and proposed solutions in
seemingly unpromising situations. It all depends on
where you call and what kind of environment I happened
to be in.
Question 24: How can you handle life
under pressure and with tough deadlines?
I generally dislike situations when everybody is to
put in a position to run around like headless chicken
and scream "we need it yesterday!". I believe that if
things are well organized, fire alarm situations can
be avoided. However, occasional emergency is an
inevitable part of office life. When it happens to me
I try not to panic but rather heavily concentrate on
what and how to do.
Question 25: What do you think you do
better: staff work or line work?
It depends on the circumstances. When there is no one to take the lead, I would do it. If there is lack of
manpower and I can help I don't mind doing line work.
Question 26: In your current position,
what problem have you identified that was previously overlooked?
When I just started at my last job and had a look
around, I realised that relations with real business
is the weakest part of our organisation. All decisions
taken within our policy making organisation sooner or
later have an impact on real business. Therefore, it
appeared bizarre to me that business circles had not
been represented. Together with other colleagues, we
prepared a memo and conducted a series of meetings on
this matter to bring it to consideration of the top
management. It was not soon but the management finally
took a decision to establish the Industry Advisory
Panel, which is due to begin operating in a short
while."
Question 27: If you had a choice of job
and a company what would you choose?
It would be a company that has been long established
in the market and that continues to grow. My dream job
would be the one where I would apply to the best all
my skills, capabilities and background. As far
particular industry is concerned, I would rather work
in the oil and gas industry, international law firm or
consulting and, perhaps surprisingly, PR. The first
three suit my previous experience and PR is my
personal predilection and it is something that I would
do if I were to start over again.
Question 28:Do you have any objection to
take a psychological test?
Not at all, provided that the results will be
announced to me.
Question 29: Do you consider yourself as
a creative person?
Indeed so. Moreover, I have an artistic mind and I try
to add a feature of beauty to what I do. I can
generate ideas or pick up on something that was given
less attention to by others and turn it into an idea.
I can also suggest the best way to implement a
project.
Question 30: How do you describe your personality?
I am very much the son of the country where there are
300 days of sunshine! I love being among people,
interacting with them, getting to know them. I am less
productive when isolated from the team. Perhaps, I get
emotional at times but as I grow old, I learn to
control myself. I am a reasonable optimist in the
sense that I do not get overexcited about things but I
try to see the other side of the coin. I possess
determination in getting things done. Perhaps at times
I am too humble about my own achievements, but this is
something that is disappearing the longer I live in
the West.
Question 31: What is your outside reading
you do?
I read Russian and foreign classics, fantasy and
periodicals.
Question 32: What are some of your
outside activities?
My favorite pastime is family outings and traveling to
other countries. When I was a student, I used to play
in a band and still play guitar and sing with my
friends. I like computer graphics and sound
engineering therefore very well familiar with
Photoshop and other applications. I do jogging and go
to the gym to keep myself fit.
Question 33: Are you continuing your
education?
I am planning to apply for a program leading to
Master's degree in law. I would like to obtain an
in-depth knowledge in international law with emphasis
on international trade and law of natural resources. I
am now at the stage of selecting a university offering
such a course.
CURRICULUM VITAE
Do you wish to see Dovlet's confidential information such as references, diplomas, achievements, etc ? If yes request confidential code via Email contact : dovlet.ovezov@exec.org
3-DNET® Thanks, you have helped us ........
Networking is a requirement for Business and Individual alike.
The ONLY security these days is how wide your network is and how shrewdly you market yourself.
3-DNET can assist you!
Copyright 1995-todate
3-DNET® is a registered trademark
The 3-D Network Company International Inc.
|
|
|
Local, national and international executive & recruitment consultancy |
|
|
| |